The Trauma for Throwaway People

When you walk through a city street and see homeless people, when you ride a city bus and see large immigrant families wearing raggedy clothing and carrying bags from the local food bank, when you see 600 – lb. individuals trying to ride a grocery store cart filled with cakes and chips, what are the first thoughts that come into your mind?

I would like you to consider marginalized persons– including those in and out of incarceration, drug and alcohol treatment, mental health hospitals, those whose highest paycheck is he amount on their disability check, those whose home pantry will not exceed what they can get from their EBT SNAP card, those who look healthy, young and fit but live on social security disability checks and in public housing, those who can’t get their kids into the good schools because they don’t fit the income bracket of the neighborhood — I would like you to go back in time to when these persons were young children.

There is a lot of very robust social science research going on right now on Adverse Childhood Events and adults outcomes of homelessness, addictions, incarceration, learning dysfunctions, mental illness, poverty and unemployment.

Social scientists have used this research to arrive at computation tables that itemizes and scores each adverse child event and show the higher the ACE, the higher the marginalization and disability and poorer health and economy of that person as an adult.

Adverse Childhood Events are basically traumas of early childhood — traumas that are sudden, acute, and intense, like abuse or death of a parent, and those that are more subtle, pervasive, and lingering like food scarcity and addictions.

As my readers know, I am using my own family system to show a number of the effects of trauma and traumatic family dynamics that alter not only the personalities and behaviors of the family members, but the culture of toxicity of the family as a whole.

As you all know, this is the basis for a book I am writing.

So now consider the “Throwaway People.”

I am in that class, and have been for much of my life since childhood, when my older siblings and parents decided to keep the sex abuse from the pedophile uncle Ronald Safsten a secret.

At that time, my family determined that I was expendable. My personhood and health and safety came second, or not at all, in lieu of protecting the sex offender who ate at our table, worked on my sister Diana Hansen’s Hawaii Senatorial campaigns, and was often putin charge of babysitting me.

Long before I was born, my older sister Melanie was sexually molested by Ronald Safsten for years when she was a young child. The family and the Mormon church knew something was going on, but chose to keep that a secret.

When I was two years old, and my older sisters were in their late teens, our family moved to Hawaii for a job offer for my father.

Guess who followed us, but the pedophile Ron Safsten, who was targeting the fresh meat in the cute little toe- head girl Heidi.

If Melanie had told someone in authority that Ron Safsten had molested her for years, and had that adult told the law, I would not have endured his sexual abuse of me.

Had the Mormon church leaders who knew of Ron’s molestations of Melanie told the law, I would have been spared.

And anyone who knows the loud, vocal, bulldozer of a personality of my older sister Hawaii State Representative Diana Hansen, who built her campaign on ”fighting for the little guy, the underdog,” and on holding the “fat cats” in power accountable can not possibly believe that she did not know about Melanie’s sex abuse — they were only about one year apart in age and together all the time. It is not realistic to believe that State Representative Diana Hansen was unaware of her campaign marketing artist Ronald Safsten grooming and abusing me, or that she was unaware that Melanie was being molested by him for ten years right under her nose.

Somewhere in all that time, spanning about 17 years, from being a close-knit, enmeshed mormon family in Bellingham, Washington, to Honolulu Hawaii, this “good mormon politically good” family decided that I was expendable. That I would be the Throwaway.

Later of course, it was Diana who wanted to get her screenplay read by a famous Hollywood producer that she was willing to trade me in to him for some sex time in trade to get her screenplay read by that producer.

By a hair, I escaped the molestation because I already knew what that train looked like on that track and I dodged it.

But when I heard the chillin word’s of Representative Diana Hansen tall me in the hotel elevator, “just don’t tell mom or dad I brought you here, okay?” I knew I was expendable. A throwaway.

So then as a pregnant woman asking my older brother Leif Hansen of Leif’s Auto collission center for protection from my abusive husband Aaron Steweart Heusser one night because he was hurting me and I was worried about the baby inside me, and Leif’s answer was, ” a man’s house is his castle, and a wife belongs in his castle, I can’t take a man’s wife out of his castle.” I knew I was expendable. I was a throwaway.

But I already knew that about Leif, as it was his friend David who took me into Leif’s bed as “man and wife,” while Leif watched with his friends and they all laughed, I knew I was expendable. I was a throwaway.

The only way I got mentally well was to get out of my family as soon as I could as a teenager, cut off all communication with them, and live my life as though they did not exist. I have to do the same thing now, today, at age 56, and the older siblings — the sex abuse enablers — are into old age — cutting myself off from them is again yielding me health, safety, peace, growth, freedom and independence from the grasp of these sociopaths.

If you talk to anyone of these older siblings, they will be all shocked and plather on about how much I was loved, spoiled, doted on as the precious youngest daughter.

But control over a family member is not love.

It is not love to create and maintain a throwaway person.

It is not love to make them mentally ill so that if she ever told about the reality of sex abuse rampant in the family, or domestic violence in her marriage, she would not be credible.

It is certainly not the legal way, the Mormon way — but these are the people who made the laws and saw to their Mormon flock’s needs, and became big business charitable contributers in the community.

Yet they abandoned me to a wife-beater, they abandoned me to a first-class manipulator in court without an attorney, they abandoned me to homelessness on the streets of Vancouver, Washington. Just like they abandoned me to a known pedophile.

They aided and abetted child estrangement by lying for and with Aaron Heusser in his use of child estrangement in an illegal custody play — which is illegal and unlawful at this present time and could mean prison time for them, as well as civil litigation to recoup the damages of parental attachment loss.

These people pretend to be so righteous and the paragon of virtue and success, but in reality, created an expendable person who became society’s throwaway person and represents a reality they go crazy trying to separate themselves from.

But they cannot escape the truths of what they have done and arranged to utilize to protect themselves from being caught. Just create an expendable person to carry that weight for you.

Control is not love. Abuse wrapped up in “This is for your own good,” and “you’ll thank me for this later” while throwing a vulnerable family member under the bus is not love. It is not strength. It is not sane.

Creating a throwaway person and sanctioning more trauma for that expendable person to endure — so they don’t have to face the music of their own behavior — is not love. Not family. Not church. Not safe, not admirable.

It’s immoral, sociopathic, and criminal.

And I’m calling them out.

——————————————–

The Making of “Heidi’s Law” is underway — Here’s what we have so far. Care to join the cause? Have a story of your own to tell? This is the Time, This is the Place.

My last few posts on this site will provide the context and background for the shaping, and eventual passing of a new domestic violence-child custody law which for now, is named “Heidi’s Law.”

We are now a group comprised of two volunteer attorneys — one a trial lawyer the other a family law attorney — three family therapists one court child custody mediator, and four domestic violence counselors and case managers.

What we have so far is a working draft of a law — a hybrid of family law and domestic violence law — that punishes a parent for manipulating child custody as an extension of his domestic violence during the marriage/divorce process, resulting in child estrangement from the victim parent.

Just as importantly, allows domestic violence restraining orders and punishments to be dispensed to any extended family member of either divorcing party, or co-worker, friend, associate, church leader, family member or significant other who meddles in or provides aid, support, alibi or cover stories for that domestic violence perpetrator in provoking, establishing, or escalating child estrangement from the victim parent.

Thirdly, “Heidi’s Law” will include monetary sanctions for the guilty party using death insurance actuarial tables and algorythyms to determine the monetary value of the abused parent’s lost time and relationship with their child as a result of the above stated manipulations and law violations. This is a new, more focused and more stringent set of punishments for child estrangement and any party who has helped the offending parent can also be arrested and criminally prosecuted and punished using those same insurance tables as restorative justice for the parent who has suffered from the manipulated child estrangement.

Fourth, any persons or divorcing parties who knowingly and willingly provoke, establish or escalate child estrangement within the framework of a divorce or child custody arrangement shall be charged with child abuse, and criminally prosecuted, retroactive to 1994.

Soon we will be gathering the initial round of necessary signatures, and asking for community involvement, advertising and endorsements.

Do you have a story to tell? Would you benefit from “Heidi’s Law?”

Heidi’s Law will grandfather in past cases going back to 1994, and includes cases where the children of the child estrangement manipulation can also sue for damages from the offending parent if they are now adults.

Much much more to come on this, and I’ll be posting here as well as direct-mailing updated newsletters to any and all — individual or advocacy groups — who want to have a voice in this very timely, and long-overdue, family law.

Contact Heidi Hansen to participate, tell us your story, or donate supplies or monies for this cause at dog.hotel.hansen@gmail.com, call 360-335-4939, and thank you.

Thank you, Donald Trump, For Making It Okay To Talk About Sociopaths — Readers, you got one in your own life?

This is the copy of my letter to the Editor today (The Oregonian, The Columbian, assorted other media):

Dear Editor,

As Mary Trump’s book is closer to release, the public will increasingly hear the word “Sociopath” more and more, and I am relieved the elephant in the room is finally acknowleged.


Not just as a means of making sense of and surviving Trump’s presidency. This is permission and obligation for victims to tell our stories and get help for the trauma from the domestic violence that these white collar sociopaths have caused and gotten away with it.

These are the sociopaths among us who can wreck family relationships for sport and hobby, getting a drama fix, getting a control fix, getting a sadistic rush from seeing the helpless fear and pain in the victim’s eyes and voice, and the supreme power of walking away from it without any emotion or conscience.

This is the season for the victims to get their say. This is the time for the victim to get validation and really make visible and demand restorative justice for the sociopath’s damages.


The white-collar sociopath is so perfect in outward markers of success, nobody believes the ex-spouse or children who suffer from their passive-aggressive manipulations and clever avoidance of accountability or their inability to experience remorse or empathy and thereby, get out of the main task of human development, which is to introspect and reflect on one’s behaviors and choices, experience the pain they caused to others, and make personal, authentic change and amends.


The white-collar sociopath does not have it in themselves to reflect, introspect, and become moved by the pain they cause others to make personal, life-affirming changes in their personalities and behaviors. They just see the situation as needing a better manipulative strategy.

Self-pity and low self-esteem tantrums are not an expression of remorse, regret or seeking forgiveness and making true amends.

A sociopath’s response to getting caught, or called-out, or brought to accountability for their destructive and duplicitous behavior is to be insulted that anyone would dare to challenge the veneer of perfection they have so carefully cultivated. They would rather throw the victim under the bus, again and again, than try to feel any authentic remorse for their unattractive choices.


In my professional experience and personal life, I can attest to the danger in extremus that these perfectly presented individuals present. Danger in their behavior, which is often carefully crafted to avoid accountability or visibility, but also danger in that they can efficiently and effectively manipulate the room so that their victims will not be believed.

These sociopaths will pick up strays along the way. Family members and associates who are so sick that they will join him in his abusive conquests, and become visible as sociopaths themselves. Peas in a pod, similar ships finding each other in the night.

Sociopaths will often seek out organizations such as extreme religions, political parties, and community groups to 1. hide their sociopathy; 2. They need that external moral structure to guide themselves through society. They have no inner, genuine, organic moral structure. Without an extreme church or political party to spell out the proper set of black-or-white normal social behaviors, they would be spending much of their lives in prison.


Look for the white-collar sociopath in divorce and child-custody cases, where their domestic violence in the marriage extends into the child custody manipulations. How they can manipulate judges and extended family members and their own children is astounding and painful. But they are not moved by pain. They do not have the cog-wheel inside to be moved by empathy or personal accountability and stop their abuses. That’s what makes them so dangerous.

When caught and called-out, these sociopaths will attempt to ”be sorry,” — but pay close attention to their behavior — it is really self-pity and narcissistic wounds, the insult of having been exposed, that they are displaying.

As a retired child therapist and survivor of an ex-husband who is a white-collar sociopath, his mother, and my own family members who gravitated towards him — ”two peas in a pod” sort of arrangement — I have been saying for years, and still call – out, that if you or somebody you know is saying “nobody believes me because he’s so perfect. He doesn’t look like ‘Joe Six-Pack,’ or “this is what she is really doing, please listen to me, why can’t anybody see what she is really up to” — listen. Look beneath the presentation of the sociopath, exercise your brain to look beyond stereotypes, and listen to the victim.


It’s the undertow you have to worry about when swimming in the ocean.


Heidi D. Hansen, M.A.

Heidi’s Take – Heed and Avoid The Sociopath List:

Aaron Stewart Heusser

Valerie Heusser Bates

Some Clergy in the LDS church

Paul DeBast

Ronald Safsten

Leif Hansen

Melanie Silvester

Rafael Campos

———————————- Who’se on your list? Need to talk about it? I’m available for Peer Mentoring, support, and resources.

What to do next?

  1. Lobby for domestic violence and child abuse laws to include the domestic violence perpetrator’s manipulations of divorce/custody as an extension of their domestic violence.
  2. Lobby for gun laws to disallow anyone with a domestic violence restraining order to purchase, use or get licenses for guns.
  3. Formally include psychological, emotional, financial and spiritual abuse in domestic violence definitions, language and lawful repercussions.
  4. Get restorative justice by means of civil lawsuits against people like Aaron Stewart Heusser (blog posted earlier on this site will explain), extended family members who associate and aid and abet sociopaths/domestic violence perps, when the criminal statute of limitations run out, including financial justice accessing hidden assets of the sociopath like Aaron Stewart Heusser, retroactive to the date of divorce.
  5. Change the family law regarding child custody assessments to make a mandatory three objective assessments, none of them paid for by either party or affiliates of either party.
  6. Restraining orders must be made easy and quickly obtained for any divorcing party’s family members, associates, co-workers, church leaders who aid and abet the domestic violence perpetrator to prohibit their meddling and self-seeking that can or will damage the child.
  7. Retroactive court-ordered sanctions including financial fines, behavioral limitations and psychological exams made and the results entered into public information – available court documents of family members, associates, church leaders, co-workers etc., who aid and abet the domestic violence perpetrator.
  8. “Exchanges” for child custody arrangements made in – trade for removal/amendments to and of domestic violence restraining orders must be prohibited, and violators sanctioned, retroactively, including family members, co-workers, church leaders and associates who aid and abet the domestic violence perpetrator.
  9. Expand the definition and sanctions for perpetrators of parent-child estrangement laws, with emphasis on using estrangement as retribution for making the ex-spouse’s domestic violence public knowledge via a restraining order. Expand the parent-child estrangement laws to include family members of the divorcing couple, associates, co-workers.
  10. Expand the mental health involuntary commitment laws to include mentally ill persons who act-out inappropriately against one or more of the divorcing members, or their children, if and when those mentally ill persons cause emotional, psychological and financial, physical damage via parent-child estrangement, committing perjury, and aiding and abetting unlawful behavior of a member of the divorcing party, participating in slander and defamation as a means to help one of the divorcing parties obtain child custody or parental allegiance to one party at the exclusion of the other.
  11. Item No. 10 behavior when it suits the purpose of alleviation of the offender’s symptoms of a verifiable Axis I and Axis II psychiatric disorder. Cover this lawfully under Danger to Self or Others psychiatric involuntary commitment laws.

Need help? Want to help? Email Heidi at: dog.hotel.hansen@gmail.com. Phone: 360-335-4939.